Upload a Primavera P6 XER/Excel schedule, validate Planned vs Actual Progress, then generate a Power BI report with BAC, PV, EV, AC, SPI, CPI, EAC and productivity intelligence.
Progress & EVM
Upload a Primavera P6 XER/Excel schedule, validate Planned vs Actual Progress, then generate a Power BI report with BAC, PV, EV, AC, SPI, CPI, EAC and productivity intelligence.
Planned vs actual
SPI & CPI
Forecast EAC
Brainbay checks Project, Data Date, baseline, BAC, PV, EV, AC, Planned Progress, Actual Progress, SPI and CPI — so planned progress and actual progress are reconciled on the same time-phased basis before creating the .pbix.
How Brainbay Progress & EVM supports better controls
Brainbay’s progress and earned-value tool reconciles Planned Progress and Actual Progress on one time-phased basis, then computes SPI, CPI, EAC and productivity so management sees variance early — not at close-out. Every figure traces back to the uploaded XER/Excel, with rules of credit and cut-off dates visible to the reviewer instead of hidden in a black box. The report supports monthly updates, forecasting and contractor discussions, and pairs with the Project Analyzer, Schedule Health and Compare Schedules tools. This is also where the planned-progress calculation you flagged is validated before the PBIX is built.
Why earned value management matters for P6 project controls
Earned value management (EVM) is the discipline that tells you whether a project is ahead or behind, not just on time but on cost. When you reconcile planned progress and actual progress on one time-phased basis, the schedule-to-date indices — SPI for schedule and CPI for cost — become trustworthy signals rather than cosmetic percentages. Brainbay Progress & EVM exists to make that reconciliation routine: upload the XER or Excel, let the tool validate the baseline and data date, and read SPI, CPI, EAC and productivity from a single report instead of a spreadsheet chase.
Planned vs actual progress, on the same basis
The most common EVM error is comparing planned percent complete to actual percent complete that were earned on different bases. Brainbay forces both onto the same time-phased curve before any index is computed, so an SPI of 0.92 means what it says: the project is delivering 92% of the value it planned to date. That single correction removes most of the monthly argument between planner and cost engineer.
Forecasting EAC without guesswork
Once SPI and CPI are reliable, the estimate at completion (EAC) stops being a hope and becomes a defensible number tied to performance to date. Brainbay surfaces EAC alongside BAC, PV, EV and AC so management sees the gap early and can decide on recovery while there is still schedule to recover. For owners running multiple packages, this is the difference between finding out at close-out and steering at month six.
Pairing Progress & EVM with the rest of Brainbay
Progress & EVM does not sit alone. The same XER that feeds earned value also feeds the Schedule Health checker and the Compare Schedules tool, so the forecast, the logic quality, and the update-to-update movement all come from one source of truth. That is what lets a controls team answer the only question an owner really asks: are we on track, and if not, what moves the finish date.
